spadez wrote:Thank you so much for the reply. I am planning on experimenting with this using a cylindrical cam,...
I'm still not entirely clear in regard to how the power from the piston would be transmitted,... assuming that the intent of this would ultimately be to transmit power to a rotating crankshaft.
The displacer riding on a cylindrical cam I can understand as the displacer is relatively light and is not transmitting power.
Like I say, I'm still not sure exactly what you have in mind, but my thoughts are that perhaps the piston and displacer should be dealt with separately (i.e. the piston attached to the crank in the ordinary way and the displacer riding a cam.)
trying to minimize friction. Using this technique, I can create any waveform for the Stirling I like.
In an internal combustion engine the timing is very critical as the compressed fuel/air mixture, when ignited, expands very rapidly - but not quite instantaneously. The idea is to time the ignition so that the maximum expansion takes place as the piston is just beginning its power stroke (about 20 degrees After Top Dead Center). It takes about 30 degrees or so of rotation for the expansion to take place, so in an internal combustion engine the timing would be advanced so that ignition takes place about 10 degrees BEFORE TDC. (in a car engine this changes at increasing engine speed, generally the advance increases with increasing engine speed. In most
small IC engines, like a push mower, the advance remains constant)
In a "normal" Stirling engine however, the equivalent of the "ignition" - that is, when the displacer moves the air from the cold side to the hot side of the displacer chamber - takes place relatively slowly, (during the course of 180 degrees rotation of the crankshaft). So the crank travels somewhere around 110 degrees from the time the displacer starts moving air from the cold side to the hot side to the time enough expansion has taken place to deliver "maximum" power to the piston... again, somewhere around 20 degrees after TDC - so a relatively long advance is needed, generally around 90 or so degrees Before TDC.
Putting the displacer on a cam, I believe, could very well "tighten up" the operation of a Stirling making it more comparable with an Internal combustion engine as the displacer could be made to move the air from the cold to the hot side much more quickly since it no longer needs to follow the rotation of the crankshaft.
Trying to have the piston follow the same curve as the displacer however, I think might be a mistake and I don't really see what advantage could possibly be derived from that.
You seem to be absolutely right about the screenshot though. From what I can see, it would almost be better if the flat "high" surface was removed, meaning the power piston was on the top of the downward slope, would this be correct? In which case, this is getting closer to the sine curve again?
Ideally, I think the piston should be some distance
down the "slope" or about 20 degrees or so past TDC at the point of maximum expansion. This would be the "sweet spot" so to speak. You don't want the piston to be right at TDC as this would be a "straight arm" situation. (i.e. the piston would be jammed straight into the crank rather than contributing to the angular momentum.)
Again, I think you should have two different curves if this is possible with whatever your set up is. I think it is a great idea, and would be a great advantage to have the
displacer follow as sharp a "square wave" as practicable while having the piston follow a regular "sine wave".
In that way the air would be moved sharply from the cold to the hot side of the displacer chamber providing what would amount to a faster "ignition" or more sudden heating of the air or gas. This should provide more concentrated power and torque to the piston. The timing would then be closer to that of an IC engine depending more upon how quickly the heat transfer can take place between whatever material your displacer chamber is made out of and the air - rather than the speed of the displacer following the crankshaft since with a cam, it would not have to follow the crank through 180 degrees to effect the air movement, but could be made to move much more quickly.
So, in this regard, material considerations would then play a greater role in timing. Here are some thermal conductivity ratings of different metals for comparison. (the higher the number the faster the heat flows through the material). This may not exactly reflect metal to air heat exchange, but rather, how fast the heat can get through the wall of the chamber to the air inside. In that sense it should reflect the potential for heat exchange, but this would also depend on surface area and the amount of turbulence.
pyrex glass: 1
stainless steel: 16
carbon steel: 54
cast iron: 55
tin: 67
nickel: 91
brass: 109
aluminum: 250
gold: 310
copper: 401
silver: 429
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/therm ... d_429.html
Im really interested in this, and im wondering, if any waveform was possible, would it be possible to improve on the sine wave?
I'm sure it would be -
for the displacer. I can't really see how any advantage could be gained by messing with the piston though. How would it transmit power to the crankshaft otherwise ?
Even a "free piston", I think, would follow a sine wave (steady reciprocating motion). What would be the advantage in having the piston pause at the end of each stroke ? (Though I'm still not clear on what your arrangement is. I may be missing something, so don't hold me to that.)
Having the displacer move quickly and then pause could have a decided advantage. faster and more thorough heat exchange. More "dwell" time for the exchange to take place...
I think it would be
really nice if the timing of this displacer cam could somehow be adjusted
while the engine is running. Similar to how an IC engine timing can be adjusted while the engine is running. This would allow for dynamic testing of the torque and power output at different advance settings without having to build a whole new engine or turn a new cam or crankshaft to test various different settings.
I haven't worked out any purely mechanical means for doing that. My solution was to move the displacer with a solenoid(s) or electromagnet(s) which could then be controlled any way you like - at least for testing.