Pressurizing a free piston stirling with a spring or rubber bands?
Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 6:20 am
Hi, I'm looking at this type of simple stirling engine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-XcDuyV2l4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrLH4AbmDuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyfo-N0HRWs
http://physicstoys.narod.ru/page/Freepi ... ston3.html
Where inertia/bouncing is what moves the displacer, which is also porous(but not necessarily) and serves as a regenerator...I ordered some glass syringes to make one, but they're quite hard to find and I'll wait a few weeks until they arrive from china.
In the meantime, I had the thought that by putting a tension spring/rubber bands between the tube and the piston, one can create pressurization of the engine, something that in the common type of stirlings requires a whole glass dome.
However, I then thought of two problems - when the engine is free, the mass of the moving cylinder creates both the Isentropic (reversible adiabatic) expansion of the gas and the Reversible isothermal compression that are in the stirling cycle.
When the engine is pressurized with powerful rubber bands to maybe triple the pressure, the intertia on expansion won't be enough to create the adiabatic expansion, that a flywheel or a free weight does. Would that cause a drop in efficiency (which makes the whole idea worthless) or even completely prevent the Carnot cycle from happening? I can't really solve that I've been thinking about it for an hour.
Also the rubber bands obey the hooke's law, so during elongation their force becomes stronger and stronger(not staying the same like a weight does). I can't really figure out how this fits in the whole idea and whether it's helping or hurting performance.
I saw that in stirling engines, doubling the pressure increases the work output by ~2-2.5 times for the same temperature difference(of course, increasing consumption as well, but in total, increasing efficiency). I see no reason why this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyfo-N0HRWs engine cannot be pressurized by increasing the weight of the top part a lot. But maybe I'm missing something.
Let's ignore mechanical issues, such as leaking for now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-XcDuyV2l4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrLH4AbmDuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyfo-N0HRWs
http://physicstoys.narod.ru/page/Freepi ... ston3.html
Where inertia/bouncing is what moves the displacer, which is also porous(but not necessarily) and serves as a regenerator...I ordered some glass syringes to make one, but they're quite hard to find and I'll wait a few weeks until they arrive from china.
In the meantime, I had the thought that by putting a tension spring/rubber bands between the tube and the piston, one can create pressurization of the engine, something that in the common type of stirlings requires a whole glass dome.
However, I then thought of two problems - when the engine is free, the mass of the moving cylinder creates both the Isentropic (reversible adiabatic) expansion of the gas and the Reversible isothermal compression that are in the stirling cycle.
When the engine is pressurized with powerful rubber bands to maybe triple the pressure, the intertia on expansion won't be enough to create the adiabatic expansion, that a flywheel or a free weight does. Would that cause a drop in efficiency (which makes the whole idea worthless) or even completely prevent the Carnot cycle from happening? I can't really solve that I've been thinking about it for an hour.
Also the rubber bands obey the hooke's law, so during elongation their force becomes stronger and stronger(not staying the same like a weight does). I can't really figure out how this fits in the whole idea and whether it's helping or hurting performance.
I saw that in stirling engines, doubling the pressure increases the work output by ~2-2.5 times for the same temperature difference(of course, increasing consumption as well, but in total, increasing efficiency). I see no reason why this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyfo-N0HRWs engine cannot be pressurized by increasing the weight of the top part a lot. But maybe I'm missing something.
Let's ignore mechanical issues, such as leaking for now.