BALLISTIC CONDUCTION, Nanostructures and Stirling Engines
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 6:30 pm
Wasn't sure wether to put this one out there or not, but what the hell...
First have a read of these excerpts from wikipedia
___________________________________________
Thermal properties
Main article: Thermal properties of nanostructures
All nanotubes are expected to be very good thermal conductors along the tube, exhibiting a property known as "ballistic conduction", but good insulators laterally to the tube axis. Measurements show that a SWNT has a room-temperature thermal conductivity along its axis of about 3500 W·m−1·K−1; compare this to copper, a metal well known for its good thermal conductivity, which transmits 385 W·m−1·K−1. A SWNT has a room-temperature thermal conductivity across its axis (in the radial direction) of about 1.52 W·m−1·K−1, which is about as thermally conductive as soil. The temperature stability of carbon nanotubes is estimated to be up to 2800 °C in vacuum and about 750°C in air.
Thermal conductivity measurements
Measurements show a single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) room-temperature thermal conductivity about 3500 W/(m·K), and over 3000 W/(m·K) for individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). Addition of nanotubes to epoxy resin can double the thermal conductivity for a loading of only 1%, showing that nanotube composite materials may be useful for thermal management applications.
___________________________________________
So - With the recent discovery of and increasing knowledge about different allotropes I wonder if anyone is attempting to use their unique properties in the field of stirling engines. Certain types of nanotubes have a surface thermal conductivity approaching a magnitude of 100 times (10000%) greater than that of an anodised aluminium surface. If one was able to 'anodise' (or coat) a metallic surface with tubes so that their tube openings were facing outwards (looking like a honeycomb) (I think that is the direction indicated, or actually it may be on their side (that would make it easier)) then you would be able to create significantly smaller, highly effective heat exchangers and regenerators and have more freedom in locating them in desirable locations relative to different stages in the cycle. (They have good temperature stability and are, from what I’ve read very structurally robust)(for such small guys they pack quite a punch)
Would it also be possible to 'dope' certain metals or surfaces with certain types of nanoparticles, or make a metal/nanoparticle 'amalgam', to improve material conductivity.
What about incorporating small particulates (nano particles, carbon nanotubes, buckyballs) into the working gas. The particles would be generally evenly dispersed due to gas turbulence and may, more effectively 'conduct' heat in or out through interaction with heat exchangers and the gas. This may change/improve the thermal properties and dynamics of the working gas.
Also the introduction of say, buckyballs into the gas could potentially have an effect of increased lubrication at rub points, acting like little ball bearings, reducing friction losses and ware.
I know its not in the realm of possibility for tyre-kickers such as myself to attempt (and pay for) such investigations, but I guess some institutions and companies can afford it and may wish to, (they may already be doing so).
Does anyone think that these potential approaches have validity, and are there any Nano Brains out there that may wish to contribute to this discussion??
vamoose
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_pr ... structures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_carbon
First have a read of these excerpts from wikipedia
___________________________________________
Thermal properties
Main article: Thermal properties of nanostructures
All nanotubes are expected to be very good thermal conductors along the tube, exhibiting a property known as "ballistic conduction", but good insulators laterally to the tube axis. Measurements show that a SWNT has a room-temperature thermal conductivity along its axis of about 3500 W·m−1·K−1; compare this to copper, a metal well known for its good thermal conductivity, which transmits 385 W·m−1·K−1. A SWNT has a room-temperature thermal conductivity across its axis (in the radial direction) of about 1.52 W·m−1·K−1, which is about as thermally conductive as soil. The temperature stability of carbon nanotubes is estimated to be up to 2800 °C in vacuum and about 750°C in air.
Thermal conductivity measurements
Measurements show a single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) room-temperature thermal conductivity about 3500 W/(m·K), and over 3000 W/(m·K) for individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs). Addition of nanotubes to epoxy resin can double the thermal conductivity for a loading of only 1%, showing that nanotube composite materials may be useful for thermal management applications.
___________________________________________
So - With the recent discovery of and increasing knowledge about different allotropes I wonder if anyone is attempting to use their unique properties in the field of stirling engines. Certain types of nanotubes have a surface thermal conductivity approaching a magnitude of 100 times (10000%) greater than that of an anodised aluminium surface. If one was able to 'anodise' (or coat) a metallic surface with tubes so that their tube openings were facing outwards (looking like a honeycomb) (I think that is the direction indicated, or actually it may be on their side (that would make it easier)) then you would be able to create significantly smaller, highly effective heat exchangers and regenerators and have more freedom in locating them in desirable locations relative to different stages in the cycle. (They have good temperature stability and are, from what I’ve read very structurally robust)(for such small guys they pack quite a punch)
Would it also be possible to 'dope' certain metals or surfaces with certain types of nanoparticles, or make a metal/nanoparticle 'amalgam', to improve material conductivity.
What about incorporating small particulates (nano particles, carbon nanotubes, buckyballs) into the working gas. The particles would be generally evenly dispersed due to gas turbulence and may, more effectively 'conduct' heat in or out through interaction with heat exchangers and the gas. This may change/improve the thermal properties and dynamics of the working gas.
Also the introduction of say, buckyballs into the gas could potentially have an effect of increased lubrication at rub points, acting like little ball bearings, reducing friction losses and ware.
I know its not in the realm of possibility for tyre-kickers such as myself to attempt (and pay for) such investigations, but I guess some institutions and companies can afford it and may wish to, (they may already be doing so).
Does anyone think that these potential approaches have validity, and are there any Nano Brains out there that may wish to contribute to this discussion??
vamoose
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_pr ... structures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotropes_of_carbon