Stirlingengineforum.com

VincentG wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:38 pm Tom, everyone here brings something to the table. That is why I can bear your multiple accusations against me(aka Jack). Fool may provide constant resistance to innovation but he has the math(like Arby's has the meat). You may disagree with the math, ....

I haven't "accused" you of anything, I don't think. Just voicing my opinion that you're frequent siding with and being all palsy walsy with these two cock suckers is a bad look for you.

Your assessment of "fools" so-called "math" as "meat" (presumably substantial) for example is a case in point

I very patiently plodded through fools so-called mathematical derivation of the Carnot limit with a completely open mind, hoping to learn something interesting. Here:

viewtopic.php?t=5601

Complete garbage circular reasoning. No "derivation" at all, just obvious number juggling in an attempted snow job. That you consider this kind of intentional deception solid math certainly puts your judgement in question.

The three of you rather frequently and unapologetically make apparent references to drug use "altered head state", "tripping" etc. in your supposed evaluation of Stirling engines, so I suppose the "math" could look pretty "meaty" from that perspective.

No, I don't agree with fools so-called "math".

If you do, you're quite a "fool" yourself, IMO and your various apparent efforts here not worth any further attention or consideration.

Matt, Fool and Vincent

The three stooges.

Tom the fact is that the world uses the basic efficiency equations that fool uses. They work for the purposes they serve. If you have any real interest in furthering scientific progress than you would do your best to conduct yourself in a professional manner and work with the 2 other people in the world that are left here. I hope to continue this all in your forum when(if) this one goes away.

For now, please move any irrelevant banter to another thread.

VincentG wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 7:58 am Tom the fact is that the world uses the basic efficiency equations that fool uses.

It's (the so-called "Carnot efficiency formula") is a useless and misleading historic artifact that nobody uses or cares about other than anti-"free energy" zealots who use it as their weapon of choice to kill people's ideas, hopes and dreams for a somewhat better world for their children and grandchildren, where people are not all killing each other over energy.

They work for the purposes they serve.

"They" or It, (the so-called "Carnot efficiency formula") is simply wrong. At best misunderstood, in reality, only the fact of a temperature difference, and at worst an intentionally concocted lie perpetrated by energy monopoly interests that have had undo control over our political and educational systems.

It's total crap that has no historical basis, no scientific validity, no experimental validation. It's completely nonsensical BS.

If you have any real interest in furthering scientific progress than you would do your best to conduct yourself in a professional manner and work with the 2 other people in the world that are left here.

I have no interest in working with either one of these two clowns (Matt and "Fool"), or you for that matter if the three of you are some kind of trio, which certainly seems to be the case.

I hope to continue this all in your forum when(if) this one goes away.

Sorry, but there will be no chance of that. If not banned already, due to their general spam generating, hacking attempts, IP being blocked, they certainly will be if either of them show up there.

If you want to continue with the kind of useless, non-productive, time and space wasting garbage the two of them have habitually ruined this forum with since their arrival, I suggest the three of you start your own carnival show somewhere, I'll be having none of it.

No trolls, no hecklers like Matt and Fool who do nothing but ruin things for everyone, so people with a real interest in the topic of Stirling engines, or alternative energy generally can never have any peace to pursue the topic in a friendly, open coherent manner.

Ass holes need not apply.

All these two do is attack, criticize, derail and ridicule, intentionally making progress impossible for others who would like to cooperate and collaborate on sharing information and projects.

For now, please move any irrelevant banter to another thread.

Tell that to your two side kicks. If either of them, or you for that matter, continue to bring up my name, my experiments, videos, forum topics, views, opinions etc. in a disparaging way I will respond as I feel it is my right to defend myself.

You seem to want to create a haven for the three of you to carry on bashing and criticizing me, sorry, but If they carry on with their ongoing crusade to discredit me, here or anywhere else, expect a response. You don't own or moderate this forum.

Tom if you weren’t so dense you would see that what Matt is working on (and fool is now willing to consider it seems), will serve to validate part of your drum beat over the last decade or more.

If you would stop jumping to conclusions and skipping from one wild theory to another we could actually get somewhere. You constantly go back and contradict what you have said in the past.

For example you vehemently criticized the NASA engine for sending heat back through the cold side.

Then when the Essex helped Matt graphically prove that a hot connected power piston is twice as effective, you doubled back and tried to introduce a theory that the cold gas can transfer power more efficiently than hot.

Then you went down the rabbit hole of the tower of power.

If anything is to be taken seriously here it must be much more than random videos with toys and inaccurate measurements. There must be clear, concise, repeatable, properly documented experiments backed up by math that can be presented to and verified by peers.

As far as I’m concerned, if you disagree with that than you are the straw man here.

VincentG wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 9:22 am Tom if you weren’t so dense you would see that what Matt is working on (and fool is now willing to consider it seems), will serve to validate part of your drum beat over the last decade or more.

If you would stop jumping to conclusions and skipping from one wild theory to another we could actually get somewhere. You constantly go back and contradict what you have said in the past.

For example you vehemently criticized the NASA engine for sending heat back through the cold side.

Then when the Essex helped Matt graphically prove that a hot connected power piston is twice as effective, you doubled back and tried to introduce a theory that the cold gas can transfer power more efficiently than hot.

Then you went down the rabbit hole of the tower of power.

If anything is to be taken seriously here it must be much more than random videos with toys and inaccurate measurements. There must be clear, concise, repeatable, properly documented experiments backed up by math that can be presented to and verified by peers.

As far as I’m concerned, if you disagree with that than you are the straw man here.

My criticism of the NASA design was based on the Kinetic theory of gas behavior.

Since then I became more familiar with REAL or ACTUAL gas behavior based on a more modern, more advanced modeling methods; Lennard-Jones potential, etc. that demonstrate that the Kinetic theory picture of how gas molecules actually interact is completely wrong.

Of course, you choose to characterize my development in understanding and sharing and relating the same in a negative light as is your choice, but I don't think I need to apologize or make excuses for being curious and learning new things or for being interested in developing new technologies.

Again, you choose to portray that in a negative way.

So, feel free to fuck yourself.

.

Tommy, your narcissistic hatred has spread to lashing out at kind.inocent posters with no justification.

.

Fool wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2024 10:33 am .

Tommy, your narcissistic hatred has spread to lashing out at kind.inocent posters with no justification.

.

On re-reading VincentG's post, I think my response is perfectly justified, so the same to you in spades.

You two fuck wads, you in particular, have spent your entire time on this forum following me around and pissing all over my threads. My videos, my every word. If he thinks there is some justification in that he can go jump off a bridge, to put it mildly.

.

So continue with your videos and experiments, without resorting to libel, and cursing. That's all we are asking. Be nice, please.

.

Fool wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 1:43 am .

So continue with your videos and experiments, without resorting to libel, and cursing. That's all we are asking. Be nice, please.

.

Screw you!

You are neither nice, nor polite. You constantly lie and slander and misrepresent me and my work and my goals and intentions, so stick it ass hole, you get what you deserve and I have not followed you around heckling and harassing you the way you have done to me without letup. You are a worthless piece of shit

Actually you are much worse than simply passively worthless. You are actively destructive doing a great deal of harm. You have actively ruined this forum, blighted, derailed and corrupted one thread after another, spreading your disinformation and lies.

And VincentG, you choose to cater to these two bozos who have spent the majority of their time in this forum following me around, trashing and derailing my topics filling them with irrelevant banter, reams of garbage posts, insults, slander, misrepresentations, heckling, insults, crude jokes, off topic derailments etc. etc. then I have no sympathy or respect for you either.

Learn how it feels to have your "important" discussion, or attempted discussion piled high with nothing but trash and garbage from idiot trolls while you try to once in a while get a word in edgewise yourself, because that is the kind of crap I've had to put up with from these two ass wipes for months if not what at least seems like years.

These two pricks have done virtually nothing else on this forum but target me for harassment. If you're ok with that than you should be ok with the same in your own thread.

.

You are hallucinating.

.

I can only hope that the time, effort, and mental strain often at the expense of more pressing life matters has been worth it over the last 2 years.

What I know is that without the active posters here I would have likely given up quickly. There is no other medium that entertains this type of speculation, including Tom’s new personal echo chamber apparently. The Stirling engine facebook groups are only interested in old models and new toys. YouTube has its benefits but it’s too hard to keep track of and share ideas, and I have a face for radio anyway.

VincentG wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:34 am I can only hope that the time, effort, and mental strain often at the expense of more pressing life matters has been worth it over the last 2 years.

What I know is that without the active posters here I would have likely given up quickly. There is no other medium that entertains this type of speculation, including Tom’s new personal echo chamber apparently. The Stirling engine facebook groups are only interested in old models and new toys. YouTube has its benefits but it’s too hard to keep track of and share ideas, and I have a face for radio anyway.

Hey VincentG, I would have gladly welcomed your participation but with comments like that, Specifically: your insults: "Tom’s new personal echo chamber" of a site that as yet has no content you appear to be excluding yourself. So be it.

IMO this forum was a lot more active before the trolls and hecklers showed up turning the place into a hell hole of constant argument, bickering, insults and off-topic banter about drug use etc

Of course the trolls themselves who are causing the problems disagree and make the claim that I'm the one driving members away.

I think history proves otherwise and the future will as well

The so-called "echo-chamber" has hardly been open and already several members from here have fled from here and have quietly registered there

I like a free and open exchange of ideas. It's the 2nd Law "Carnot Limit" fanatics that want to shut down alternative viewpoints and insist on across the board conformity with supposed "established science".

You fuckers have no tolerance or respect for innovation and creative thinking.

So kiss my ass.

This was never an exclusive "established science" forum. It was mostly or originally simply a "tin can" model engines forum for hobbyists.

Nobody here needs your supposed "scientific validation". People used to come here to just have fun and share ideas and discoveries not wage war over what does or doesn't constitute "valid science". Get lost trolls.

.

What does "need" have to do with anything. We don't need your banter.

.

Fool wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 11:05 pm .

What does "need" have to do with anything. We don't need your banter.

.

I think you are right, in the sense that VincentG does not "need" me here spamming his thread arguing with you. He started this thread. On the other hand there should be an abundance of freedom of expression.

Here on this thread, however, our "freedom" to argue interferes with VincentG's freedom or right to have a coherent on-topic discussion.

You, of course, should be free also to express your belief in "classical" physics, but trolling my threads, let's call it "beyond classical physics" if excessive and disrespectful, spamming, going off topic, basically posting na na na na nah, I'm here and I'm not going to let you have your conversation because I don't agree, nah nah nah. nah-----------

Filing someone's topic with complete garbage and interfering with the right of others to pursue a topic, then some moderation and control, unfortunately becomes necessary if only to keep things somewhat organized and useful.

This discussion might be moved to a "forum moderation and politics" category heading. Then VincentG can carry on here in peace.

People simply don't "need" Pet Adoption advertisements in the Automotive section of the classified ads.

Likewise, people researching apparent second law violations don't need you continually and disrespectfully interfering with their investigations.

You, unfortunately do not recognize or respect the rights of others to "agree to disagree". You insist that everyone must agree with you or be subject to your continual harassment or what you think is "correction" or "education" or "help".

People do not need your "help". In most cases, those looking into meta-physics topics already know all about classical or conventional physics. They don't need you continually derailing and interfering, it's a waste of time, off-topic, disrespectful, ultimately destructive and detrimental to progress and advancement.

Right now, I'm being disrespectful answering you and arguing with you about this off-topic subject on a thread that has nothing to do with forum organization or forum politics just to illustrate a point.

I don't like excessive, overbearing, heavy handed forum moderation, but sometimes moderation becomes necessary just to maintain some sense of organization so people can find information easily, much like a library of books benefits from some categorization.

If I'm in a library trying to read a book about the Proell effect I don't "need" someone bashing me over the head with a high school physics textbook. Likewise for a group or a club of any kind trying to have any kind of discussion on any topic. They have a right to discuss the topic in peace without harassment and continual disruption and interference.

You, "fool" unfortunately, do not seem to recognize such basic principles of social interaction, therefore your disruptive behavior needs moderation to protect others rights.

In extreme cases someone will be excluded from the "library" premises entirely when they fail to keep their disrespectful unruly behavior in check after several warnings.

People having a casual conversation about their model engine hobby don't "need" some overbearing "science" taskmaster trying to enforce double blind scientific peer review protocols on their informal kitchen table experiments, they don't need enforcement of strict technical scientific language when talking about heat and pressure.

You, fool, apparently want to be the moderator of a classical physics forums and have some ambition to mold this forum into your own idea of what a classical physics science forum with you as the moderator should be.

You're in the wrong section of the library, or in the wrong library altogether and nobody appointed you the moderator here to be dictating what others are allowed to talk about.

You have intruded into, derailed, interfered with, spammed and disrupted numerous topics on this forum and continue to do so, apparently, in your own words, with the goal of completely sinking the ship looking forward with glee to the day this forum goes off line.

In such a case there will be no admission for you in the reconstructed forum. In extreme cases antisocial people need to be excluded from society to protect the rights and freedoms of others.