Page 10 of 10
Re: Forces of attraction and repulsion of gas molecules in a Stirling engine.
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 4:35 am
by Fool
.
Not exceeding the breaking torque is a very important design principal. The torque needed to deliver 100,000 Watts, as claimed, at a observed RPM of about 5 or so, would require a ludicrous amount of shaft diameter, very obviously not the case in any videos of the device.
.
Re: Forces of attraction and repulsion of gas molecules in a Stirling engine.
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 8:08 am
by Tom Booth
Fool wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 4:35 am
.
Not exceeding the breaking torque is a very important design principal. The torque needed to deliver 100,000 Watts, as claimed, at a observed RPM of about 5 or so, would require a ludicrous amount of shaft diameter, very obviously not the case in any videos of the device.
.
Whatever your little pea brain imagines about a technology you obviously can't comprehend is bound to be wrong. Your idiotic speculations are without foundation. Your mechanical aptitude, like your common sense is non-existent commensurate with your observational skills. You can not say anything meaningful about a subject like "torque", when you obviously don't even know the meaning of the word.
Re: Forces of attraction and repulsion of gas molecules in a Stirling engine.
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:23 am
by Fool
.
It takes one to know one. Grow up.
.