Fool and sometimes others here (Matt Brown, "Nobody"etc.) exhibit such a wide range of personalities, attitudes and points of view and apparent forgetfulness regarding things they posted or previous conversations, but always with the same talking points, I can't help but think they are not individuals but rather just a computer terminal in a professional Shill mill.
https://www.dogsonacid.com/threads/what ... et.787627/
Fools Job
Re: Fools Job
.
What Tommy doesn't understand is that to be a shill you must first be a liar. Nothing I've said here goes against classical theory. People, use your own brains. Investigate, read from reputable sources, look at why half baked internet mouthpieces are wrong. Yes it is easy to learn good science, but it takes effort to recognize fantasy from science on your part. Science isn't about belief, it is about reliability.
Tommy's insinuation here about me is a lie.
Tommy also fails to recognize the difference between a shill mill, (political), and a mathematical, logical, and scientific discussion (reality). The reason I will not be participating in any site he moderates is the fact that I wouldn't be treated fairly. Be very cautious of his new website. It will lack valid science. He's called valid classical science, old and obsolete. But he doesn't know or understand it, so his point is a fallacy.
.
What Tommy doesn't understand is that to be a shill you must first be a liar. Nothing I've said here goes against classical theory. People, use your own brains. Investigate, read from reputable sources, look at why half baked internet mouthpieces are wrong. Yes it is easy to learn good science, but it takes effort to recognize fantasy from science on your part. Science isn't about belief, it is about reliability.
Tommy's insinuation here about me is a lie.
Tommy also fails to recognize the difference between a shill mill, (political), and a mathematical, logical, and scientific discussion (reality). The reason I will not be participating in any site he moderates is the fact that I wouldn't be treated fairly. Be very cautious of his new website. It will lack valid science. He's called valid classical science, old and obsolete. But he doesn't know or understand it, so his point is a fallacy.
.
Re: Fools Job
.
Yes, your site will be nothing more than the blind leading the blind. And I wish it well and far away from me.
.
Yes, your site will be nothing more than the blind leading the blind. And I wish it well and far away from me.
.