Could Both Carnot and Tom be Correct?

[Fool]

I have demonstrated several correct ways to have stated the percentage. The important things to be sure of in mathematics are the little details and standards and precise definitions. It's the only way to learn why mathematics is so reliable. Gloss over the details and it loses its meaning.

.

[Tom Booth]

I have demonstrated several correct ways to have stated the percentage. The important things to be sure of in mathematics are the little details and standards and precise definitions. It's the only way to learn why mathematics is so reliable. Gloss over the details and it loses its meaning.

.

What you did is to take a statement out of context then twist and misinterpret that perfectly correct statement and insist it was wrong when it wasn't. Then try to insert your own "correct" calculation which was not correct at all for that context.

You apparently just enjoy wasting time and spreading confusion or like arguing for the sake of argument even long after you've been proven wrong.

Typical useless "Troll".

[Fool]

Last I checked it is the trolls that resort to name calling, when corrected. Grow up.

[Tom Booth]

Last I checked it is the trolls that resort to name calling, when corrected. Grow up.

Your so-called "corrections" are nothing more than a diversion and a waste of time.

Your a moronic troll at best or some kind of malicious saboteur out to derail conversation and research or both.

Either way a waste of time and internet/forum resources.

[Fool]

Blah blah blah...