Search found 3 matches
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:23 pm
- Forum: Stirling and "Hot Air" Engine Forum
- Topic: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10723
Re: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators.
Also, who got one on a spacecraft?? Stirling engines are usually quite weighty aren't they...?
- Tue Dec 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Forum: Stirling and "Hot Air" Engine Forum
- Topic: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10723
Re: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators.
"Can any of us claim to be able to produce an engine that will run every day for 25 years?" Not without maintenance / oil changes / replacing seals... I think if you were careful though you could get away with only basic maintenance once a year or so, and replacing parts every 10 years or ...
- Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:40 am
- Forum: Stirling and "Hot Air" Engine Forum
- Topic: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10723
Re: Photo-voltiac cells vs. free-piston stirling generators.
Hi, Commercially available PV cells (silicone based) are around 20% efficient at turning solar energy into electricity (although I think the maximum achieved is about 40-50% at the moment). Also they cost quite a lot. If you get it right then you can make a solar concentrator & stirling engine u...